Skip to content
sudopicks
esc

Radxa ROCK 5C vs Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W

Researched, not hands-on tested.How we review ›

all judged against single-board computers at a similar price

The Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W scores 6.9/10 overall, ahead of the Radxa ROCK 5C at 6.5/10.

The Radxa ROCK 5C leads on performance, storage and I/O and networking.

The Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W leads on software support.

They score the same on value.

The biggest difference is software support, where the Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W scores 10/10 to the Radxa ROCK 5C's 5/10.

Radxa ROCK 5C

Radxa ROCK 5C

6.5/10verdict: good, not the best

The ROCK 5C is for homelabbers and developers who want a lot of CPU and RAM in a small board. It suits people who are happy to follow Radxa's own Debian and Android images or the third-party systems listed for it. It is a weaker fit if you want native M.2 storage.

Check price at Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W

Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W

6.9/10verdict: buy

The Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is for people who need a wireless quad-core Arm board for headless projects. It suits those replacing an original Pi Zero or building embedded and IoT jobs that need a 40-pin footprint and Bluetooth. It is a poor fit for anyone who wants a desktop, wired networking or fast storage.

Typically about £14.40 in the UK when we researched itCheck price at Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

Scores, criterion by criterion

CriterionWeightRadxa ROCK 5CRaspberry Pi Zero 2 W
Software support30%5/1010/10
Performance25%9/106/10
Storage15%5/104/10
I/O and networking15%6/105/10
Value15%7/107/10
Overall6.5/106.9/10

Specifications

SpecRadxa ROCK 5CRaspberry Pi Zero 2 W
Processor (SoC)Rockchip RK3588S2Broadcom BCM2710A1, quad-core 64-bit Arm Cortex-A53 at 1GHz
Memory4GB, 8GB, 16GB or 32GB; V1.1 uses LPDDR4X, V2.1 uses LPDDR5512MB LPDDR2
Storage options1x eMMC connector, 1x microSD card slot, no SPI flash; no native M.2 slot; PCIe 2.1 1-lane via FPC connectormicroSD card slot only
NetworkingGigabit Ethernet (PoE via optional HAT), WiFi 6, BT 5.4 with external antenna connector2.4GHz 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.2, BLE, onboard antenna; no Ethernet
GPIO40-pin header, Raspberry Pi-style layout, 3.3V logic, up to 27 GPIO40-pin HAT-compatible I/O header footprint, unpopulated
Video outputs1x HDMI 2.1 up to 8K, 1x MIPI DSI up to 2KMini HDMI port; composite video via test points
Power input5V via USB Type-C; at least 10W recommended, 25W with full USB and PCIe loadMicro USB, rated 5V DC 2.5A (supply rating)

Strengths and weaknesses

Radxa ROCK 5C

  • + Eight-core RK3588S2 with 6 TOPS NPU
  • + RAM options from 4GB up to 32GB
  • + Raspberry Pi-style 40-pin header
  • − No native M.2 slot; microSD bottlenecks storage
  • − No power supply in the box
  • − PCIe drive stays powered when board is off

Skip it if:

  • Buyers who want a native M.2 NVMe slot on the board
  • Buyers who want a power supply included in the box
Read the full Radxa ROCK 5C review ›

Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W

  • + Quad-core 1GHz CPU is a clear step up from the original Zero
  • + Drop-in replacement for the original Zero, easing migration
  • + Wi-Fi is competent and the onboard antenna is decent
  • − 512MB RAM hampers web browsing
  • − Runs hot under load and needs cooling
  • − No Ethernet, no 5GHz Wi-Fi, header pins unpopulated

Skip it if:

  • Buyers who need wired Ethernet or 5GHz Wi-Fi
  • Anyone wanting a browser-based desktop with 512MB of RAM
  • Buyers who need fast storage or USB 3 peripherals
Read the full Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W review ›

More comparisons

Compare all single-board computers · Best single-board computers