Skip to content
sudopicks
esc

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus

Researched, not hands-on tested.How we review ›

all judged against desktop processors at a similar price

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 6.7/10 overall, ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus at 6.5/10.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D leads on single-core performance, efficiency and platform.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus leads on multi-core performance and integrated graphics.

The biggest difference is multi-core performance, where the Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus scores 9/10 to the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 6/10.

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

6.7/10verdict: buy

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is for gamers building an AM5 desktop who want strong gaming performance from an eight-core chip. It also suits developers and homelabbers who want DDR5, PCIe 5.0 and optional ECC support on one platform. Buyers who need many cores, low power draw or media transcoding from the processor itself should check the limits first.

Typically about £265 in the UK when we researched itCheck price at Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus

Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus

6.5/10verdict: buy

The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is for builders who want many cores for compiling, VMs and rendering on a desktop budget. It also suits media server owners who value HEVC hardware encoding from the integrated graphics. It is a poorer fit for always-on machines where idle power matters, or for gaming-first builds.

Typically about £273.59 in the UK when we researched itCheck price at Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

Scores, criterion by criterion

CriterionWeightAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DIntel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus
Multi-core performance25%6/109/10
Single-core performance20%8/107/10
Efficiency20%6/103/10
Platform20%8/106/10
Integrated graphics15%5/107/10
Overall6.7/106.5/10

Specifications

SpecAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DIntel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus
Cores / threads8 cores / 16 threads24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores), 24 threads
Base / boost clock4.2 GHz base, up to 5 GHz boostP-core base 3.7 GHz, E-core base 3.2 GHz; max turbo 5.5 GHz (P-core 5.4 GHz, E-core 4.7 GHz)
SocketAM5LGA 1851
TDP120 W defaultProcessor Base Power 125 W; Maximum Turbo Power 250 W
CacheL1 512 KB, L2 8 MB, L3 96 MB36 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 40 MB total L2
Integrated graphicsAMD Radeon Graphics, 2 graphics cores, 2200 MHzIntel Graphics, 4 Xe-cores, max dynamic frequency 2 GHz; HEVC hardware encode/decode; AV1 hardware encode not confirmed
Memory supportDDR5, 2 channels, max 128 GB, UDIMM, ECC supported with motherboard supportMax 256 GB; up to DDR5 7200 MT/s; 2 memory channels; ECC supported

Strengths and weaknesses

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

  • + Strong gaming performance reported by owners
  • + AM5 platform with PCIe 5.0 and ECC support
  • + Good value reported at current UK prices
  • − 120 W default TDP
  • − Eight cores caps heavy parallel workloads
  • − Basic integrated graphics only

Skip it if:

  • Buyers who need many cores for heavy rendering or large VM hosts
  • Homelabbers who want a low-power always-on server
  • Anyone relying on the integrated graphics for more than basic display output
Read the full AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D review ›

Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus

  • + 24 cores and 24 threads for compiling and VMs
  • + Reviewers praised its price-to-performance
  • + ECC support listed, plus HEVC hardware encode and decode
  • − Highest idle power in Tom's Hardware's test pool
  • − Reviewers report heat and high power draw
  • − Gaming trails AMD X3D chips, per reviewers

Skip it if:

  • Homelabbers building a low-power, always-on server
  • Gamers who want the fastest gaming chip, such as an AMD X3D part
  • Anyone who needs confirmed AV1 hardware encoding
Read the full Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 270K Plus review ›

More comparisons

Compare all desktop processors · Best desktop processors