Skip to content
sudopicks
esc

UGREEN NASync DXP4800GT vs QNAP TS-464-8G

Researched, not hands-on tested.How we review ›

all judged against NAS at a similar price

The UGREEN NASync DXP4800GT scores 7.5/10 overall, ahead of the QNAP TS-464-8G at 7.0/10.

The UGREEN NASync DXP4800GT leads on networking and memory ceiling.

The QNAP TS-464-8G leads on storage capacity (bays, M.2), CPU and transcoding and software and ecosystem.

They score the same on openness.

The biggest difference is networking, where the UGREEN NASync DXP4800GT scores 10/10 to the QNAP TS-464-8G's 7/10.

NASync DXP4800GT

UGREEN NASync DXP4800GT

7.5/10verdict: buy

The DXP4800GT is a four-bay NAS for people who want 10GbE without adding a card. It suits homelabbers and small offices who plan to run Docker or virtual machines and want room to grow memory up to 64GB. Buyers who need PCIe expansion or a very open software platform should look at the limits first.

Typically about £529.99 in the UK when we researched itCheck price at Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

QNAP TS-464-8G

QNAP TS-464-8G

7.0/10verdict: buy

The TS-464-8G suits people who want a four-bay NAS with fast local flash and room to grow the network. It fits home media servers that rely on hardware transcoding, and small setups that want SSD caching alongside spinning disks. Buyers who care about idle power draw should read the owner feedback first.

Typically about £636 in the UK when we researched itCheck price at Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

Scores, criterion by criterion

CriterionWeightUGREEN NASync DXP4800GTQNAP TS-464-8G
Storage capacity (bays, M.2)20%8/109/10
CPU and transcoding20%6/107/10
Networking20%10/107/10
Memory ceiling15%9/106/10
Software and ecosystem15%5/106/10
Openness10%6/106/10
Overall7.5/107.0/10

Specifications

SpecUGREEN NASync DXP4800GTQNAP TS-464-8G
Drive bays4 × SATA 3.5"/2.5" bays (bays 1–2 also support U.2 NVMe)4 x 3.5-inch SATA 6Gb/s
CPUAMD Ryzen Embedded R2514, 4 cores / 8 threads, 2.1–3.7GHz, Zen+ generation, configurable TDP 12–25WIntel Celeron N5095, 4 cores/4 threads, burst up to 2.9 GHz
Memory8GB DDR4 4800MHz installed, expandable to 64GB, ECC (ODECC) supported8 GB SODIMM DDR4, 2 slots, maximum 16 GB
Networking2 × 10GbE RJ45; no Wi-Fi2 x 2.5GbE; 5GbE and 10GbE optional via PCIe expansion card
M.2 slots2 × M.2 NVMe slots2 x M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 x1 slots, not hot-swappable
ExpansionNo PCIe expansion, no Thunderbolt; front 1 × USB-C 10Gb/s, 1 × USB-A 10Gb/s; rear 1 × USB-A 10Gb/s, 2 × USB-A 5Gb/s, HDMI 4K, SD 3.0 card reader; bays 1–2 support U.2 NVMe (PCIe 3.0 x4)1 x PCIe Gen 3 x2 slot
Operating systemUGOS ProQTS by default; QuTS hero available as an option

Strengths and weaknesses

UGREEN NASync DXP4800GT

  • + Two 10GbE ports with link aggregation up to 20Gbps
  • + Memory expandable to 64GB, with ECC supported
  • + Four SATA bays plus two M.2 slots and U.2 support
  • − No PCIe expansion and no Thunderbolt
  • − UGOS may feel restrictive to advanced users
  • − Fan noise reports conflict, and they cover the Plus model

Skip it if:

  • Buyers who need a PCIe slot or Thunderbolt for add-in cards
  • Advanced users who want deep control beyond what UGOS exposes
  • Anyone who needs Wi-Fi built into the NAS
Read the full UGREEN NASync DXP4800GT review ›

QNAP TS-464-8G

  • + Two M.2 slots plus four SATA bays
  • + Dual 2.5GbE with optional 5GbE or 10GbE card
  • + Hardware transcoding via Intel UHD Graphics
  • − Owners consider power draw high for four bays
  • − M.2 slots are PCIe Gen 3 x1 and not hot-swappable
  • − Ships with 8GB and a 16GB ceiling

Skip it if:

  • Buyers who need low idle power draw for an always-on unit
  • Anyone planning to run many virtual machines at once
  • Users who need fast M.2 storage pools rather than caching
Read the full QNAP TS-464-8G review ›

More comparisons

Compare all NAS · Best NAS