Skip to content
sudopicks
esc

BenQ GW2790QT vs BenQ RD320UA

Researched, not hands-on tested.How we review ›

all judged against monitors at a similar price

The BenQ RD320UA scores 7.1/10 overall, ahead of the BenQ GW2790QT at 6.4/10.

The BenQ RD320UA leads on panel quality, sharpness for text and connectivity and docking.

They score the same on ergonomics, refresh rate and motion and build and warranty.

BenQ GW2790QT

BenQ GW2790QT

6.4/10verdict: good, not the best

The BenQ GW2790QT is a 27 inch 1440p IPS monitor for people who want to dock a laptop over a single USB-C cable. It suits desk setups that need a USB hub, 65W charging and an adjustable stand more than fast motion. It is a sensible fit for office, admin and development work on a laptop.

Typically about £275 in the UK when we researched itCheck price at Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

BenQ RD320UA

BenQ RD320UA

7.1/10verdict: good, not the best

The BenQ RD320UA is for people who want a large 4K IPS screen that docks a laptop over a single USB-C cable. It suits desks that share the monitor between two computers, thanks to the built-in KVM and 90W USB-C. It is a weaker fit for anyone who wants high refresh rates or convincing HDR.

Typically about £699.99 in the UK when we researched itSearch Amazon UK (opens in a new tab, affiliate link)

Affiliate link. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Details

Scores, criterion by criterion

CriterionWeightBenQ GW2790QTBenQ RD320UA
Panel quality25%6/107/10
Sharpness for text20%6/107/10
Connectivity and docking20%8/109/10
Ergonomics15%8/108/10
Refresh rate and motion10%4/104/10
Build and warranty10%5/105/10
Overall6.4/107.1/10

Specifications

SpecBenQ GW2790QTBenQ RD320UA
Screen size27 inch31.5 inch
Resolution2560x1440 (native and max), 109 PPI3840x2160 max
Panel typeIPS, LED backlight, matte coating, 99% sRGB, 1000:1 native contrast, 350 nits typical, 178°/178° viewing angle, 5 ms GtGIPS
Refresh rate75 Hz60 Hz; 5 ms GtG response time
Inputs and USB-CHDMI 1.4 (x1), DisplayPort 1.2 (x1), DisplayPort out (MST), one USB-C input with 65W Power Delivery, DisplayPort Alt Mode and data; three USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 downstream (4.5W charging) and one USB-C downstream (7.5W charging); no Ethernet listedUSB-C with 90W Power Delivery, DisplayPort Alt Mode and data; USB Type-A downstream; two USB-C downstream ports at 10 Gbps; built-in KVM; HDMI and DisplayPort video inputs
Stand adjustmentTilt -5° to 20°, swivel 20° left and right, pivot 90°, height adjustment 110 mmErgo Arm with height, tilt, swivel and pivot
HDRnot listedHDR10 and VESA DisplayHDR 400

Strengths and weaknesses

BenQ GW2790QT

  • + Single USB-C cable carries video, data and 65W charging
  • + Stand adjusts for height, tilt, swivel and pivot
  • + Four downstream USB ports plus DisplayPort out
  • − 75 Hz refresh rate only
  • − No built-in KVM, no Ethernet listed
  • − Heavy, with a large base footprint

Skip it if:

  • Gamers who want 100 Hz or higher refresh rates
  • Buyers who need a built-in KVM or Ethernet in the monitor
  • Anyone with a shallow desk who dislikes large, heavy bases
Read the full BenQ GW2790QT review ›

BenQ RD320UA

  • + USB-C with 90W Power Delivery and built-in KVM
  • + Anti-glare Nano Matte finish praised by owners
  • + Flexible Ergo Arm with height, tilt, swivel and pivot
  • − Only 60 Hz refresh rate
  • − HDR performance described as weak by owners
  • − Owners report plastic build and difficult setup

Skip it if:

  • Gamers who want a refresh rate above 60 Hz
  • Buyers who want convincing HDR for video or games
  • Anyone who wants a metal-feel build and an easy setup
Read the full BenQ RD320UA review ›

More comparisons

Compare all monitors · Best monitors